While reading Chapter 8 in Community Practice: Theories and skills for Social Workers (Second Edition) by Hardcastle and Powers, which discusses the importance of assertiveness in relation to community practice, I asked myself (I even wrote it in the margin) "Who sets the standard for assertiveness?" Though what is perceived as assertiveness can vary among genders and cultures, (probably even age groups) there still seems to be a dominant standard. While initially I reflected back to my experiences in traditionally male-dominated workplaces and how I had to make changes to the way I communicate in order to be listened to, taken seriously, followed and respected. I felt that survival in these places meant adopting the standard; now I find myself more drawn to this assertiveness in others. Not to say that the "dominant standard of assertiveness" is all bad; I think it is important to deconstruct the ideas and ask who's rule is this anyway?, it helps me look at the interplay between individuals, groups and systems, power distribution, etc. Tannen (1990) reminded me that men too are judged in relation to communication, while assertiveness training "judges women by men's standards, sensitivity training (therapy) judges men by women's standards" (Hardcastle & Powers, 2004 p.222).
Sunday, October 25, 2009
A Look at Assertiveness
While reading Chapter 8 in Community Practice: Theories and skills for Social Workers (Second Edition) by Hardcastle and Powers, which discusses the importance of assertiveness in relation to community practice, I asked myself (I even wrote it in the margin) "Who sets the standard for assertiveness?" Though what is perceived as assertiveness can vary among genders and cultures, (probably even age groups) there still seems to be a dominant standard. While initially I reflected back to my experiences in traditionally male-dominated workplaces and how I had to make changes to the way I communicate in order to be listened to, taken seriously, followed and respected. I felt that survival in these places meant adopting the standard; now I find myself more drawn to this assertiveness in others. Not to say that the "dominant standard of assertiveness" is all bad; I think it is important to deconstruct the ideas and ask who's rule is this anyway?, it helps me look at the interplay between individuals, groups and systems, power distribution, etc. Tannen (1990) reminded me that men too are judged in relation to communication, while assertiveness training "judges women by men's standards, sensitivity training (therapy) judges men by women's standards" (Hardcastle & Powers, 2004 p.222).
Sunday, October 18, 2009
Community 4 CASA
I didn't know about CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocates) for children until one of my undergrad classmates at Humboldt State talked about it in class. Since then I have met other CASA's, one of which works at a beauty shop that I go to. CASA's aren't necessarily social workers or social work students, they be anyone from the community that completes the training and is able to show "objectivity, competence and commitment." CASA's work with children who are involved in the court system typically due to abuse or neglect. They spend time with a child, becoming a "special friend." They also submit written reports to the court and collaborate with other volunteers and professionals in the child's life. (I also understand that a CASA could work with children from the same family.) http://www.humboldtcasa.org/Monday, October 5, 2009
Stand-down Success

This year's t-shirt. |
